Last edited by Akinoramar
Tuesday, November 10, 2020 | History

2 edition of argument, shewing, that a standing army is inconsistant with a free government found in the catalog.

argument, shewing, that a standing army is inconsistant with a free government

John Trenchard

argument, shewing, that a standing army is inconsistant with a free government

  • 151 Want to read
  • 25 Currently reading

Published by Published by The Rota at the University of Exeter in (Exeter) .
Written in English

    Subjects:
  • Standing army.

  • Edition Notes

    Statementby John Trenchard with Walter Moyle.
    ContributionsMoyle, Walter, 1672-1721.
    The Physical Object
    Paginationiv, 30 p. ;
    Number of Pages30
    ID Numbers
    Open LibraryOL21347374M

    – John Trenchard, “An Argument Shewing, that a Standing Army is inconsistent with a Free Government, and absolutely destructive to the Constitution of the English Monarchy” () (emphasis mine) " I have but one lamp by which my feet are guided, and that is the lamp of experience. I know of no way of judging the future but by the past.”.   Free registration for all U.S. Government and Federal Agency personnel during annual NTOA tradeshow. National Tactical Officers Association. Doylestown, PA (September ) – .   [Thus,] there is no end to observations on the difference between the measures likely to be pursued by a minister backed by a standing army, and those of a court awed by the fear of an armed people.” (Aristotle, as quoted by John Trenchard and Water Moyle, An Argument Shewing, That a Standing Army Is Inconsistent with a Free Government, and.


Share this book
You might also like
How to be like women of power

How to be like women of power

Early medieval history of Kashmir

Early medieval history of Kashmir

Discovering Deal (historic guide).

Discovering Deal (historic guide).

Gengifrnt Mtrindxdont Delet

Gengifrnt Mtrindxdont Delet

Mode 2

Mode 2

guide to special housing for aged people.

guide to special housing for aged people.

Dictionary of spiritualism

Dictionary of spiritualism

Oithóna

Oithóna

new American biographic dictionary

new American biographic dictionary

Ancient Peruvian textiles

Ancient Peruvian textiles

Denton (Then & Now)

Denton (Then & Now)

U.S. Medical Licensing Exam (Usmle: Step III - Patient Management (Admission Test Series)

U.S. Medical Licensing Exam (Usmle: Step III - Patient Management (Admission Test Series)

Welfare Reform: Past Successes, New Challenges

Welfare Reform: Past Successes, New Challenges

argument, shewing, that a standing army is inconsistant with a free government by John Trenchard Download PDF EPUB FB2

An Argument Shewing, that a Standing Army is inconsistent with a Free Government, and absolutely destructive to the Constitution of the English Monarchy our Constitution. And this is so evident and important a truth, that no legislator ever founded a free government.

: An Argument, Shewing, That a standing army is inconsistant with a free government book a Standing Army Is Inconsistent With a Free Government, and Absolutely Destructive to the Constitution of the English Monarchy (Classic Reprint) (): Trenchard, John: Books.

An Argument Shewing, that a Standing Army is inconsistent with a Free Government, and absolutely destructive to the Constitution of the English Monarchy Created Date 1/1/ AM. Argument, shewing, that a standing army is inconsistant with a free government. [Exeter] Published by The Rota at the University of Exeter, (OCoLC) Document Type: Book: All Authors / Contributors: John Trenchard; Walter Moyle.

An Argument Shewing, that a Standing Army Is inconsistent with A Free Government, and absolutely destructive to the Constitution of the English Monarchy. London: No Publisher, Slim quarto, disbound, complete as issued in 18 leaves. Housed in. An argument shewing that a standing army is inconsistent with a free government / by John Trenchard with Walter Moyle 'The Rota' [Exeter] (c/o Professor M.M.

Goldsmith, Streatham Court, Rennes Drive, Exeter, Devon) Australian/Harvard Citation. Trenchard, John. & Moyle, Walter. Full text of "An argument shewing that a standing army is inconsistent with a free government and absolutely destructive to the constitution of the English monarchy" See that a standing army is inconsistant with a free government book formats speciAL coLLecrloNS t)OUQLAS LifeRARy AT kiNQSXION kiNQSTON ONTARIO CANADA 3, o3o, r ' '"- 3., a'50 D&5* A N ARGUMENT.

An Argument Shewing That a Standing Army Is Inconsistent with a Free Government and Absolutely Destructive to the Constitution of the English Monarchy. London: s.n, APA: (). An argument shewing that a standing army is inconsistent with a free government and absolutely destructive to the constitution of the English monarchy.

London: s.n. 27 first part, entitled, "An argument shewing, that a standing army is inconsistent with a free government," was written by John Trenchard and Walter Moyle.

It is often thought Trenchard also assisted in the second part; however attributed solely to Moyle by BM, Wing, and Halkett and uction of original in Bristol Public.

An argument showing that a standing army is inconsistent with a free government - Free download as PDF File .pdf), Text File .txt) or read online for free. Book by John Trenchard. : An argument, shewing that a standing army is inconsistent with a free government and absolutely destructive to the constitution of the English monarchy () (): Samuel Johnson: BooksAuthor: Samuel Johnson.

Excerpt from An Argument, Shewing, That a Standing Army Is Inconsistent With a Free Government, and Absolutely Destructive to the Constitution of the English Monarchy The Whole Earth 5 (0 that this is the Ark Which if the Dove be fent forth, the will find no refiing place till her.

About the Publisher Forgotten Books publishes hundreds of thousands of rare and classic books. Page 1 An ARGUMENT, shewing, that a Standing Army, with Consent of Par∣liament, is not Inconsistent with a Free Government, &c.

IN the Great Debates about a Standing Army; and in all the Arguments us'd on one side and 'tother, in the Case it seems to me, that both Par∣ties are Guilty of running into the Extreams of the Controversie.

Argument shewing that a standing army is inconsistent with a free government. By John Trenchard and Walter Moyle. Abstract [4], 38 n by J. Trenchard, assisted by W. Moyle. BM ().Reproduction of original in Yale University Library. An Argument Shewing That a Standing Army Is Inconsistent with a Free Government and Absolutely Destructive to the Constitution of the English Monarchy: Moyle, Walter, Trenchard, John: : LibrosFormat: Pasta dura.

[10]Trenchard, An Argument Shewing that a Standing Army is Inconsistent with a Free Government, [11]Ibid., 4. [12]Clinton Rossiter, Seedtime of the Republic: the origin of the American tradition of political liberty(New York, NY: Harcourt, Brace, ), An Argument Shewing, that a Standing Army Is Inconsistent with a Free Government, and absolutely destructive to the Constitution of the English Monarchy () The Militia Reformed: An easy scheme of furnishing England with a constant land force, capable to prevent or to subdue any foreign power, and to maintain perpetual quite at home, without.

SOME REFLECTIONS OnaPamphletlatelyPublifh'd ARGUMENT Entituled,AN Shewingthat AStandingArmy AIsinconfiftentwith FreeGovernment, AND AbfolutelyDeftrudivetothe ConftitutionoftheEngli/h MONAEICHY. Hardwords JsalonfiesandFears SetsFolkstogetherbjtheEars. HudibrasLib.T. Cfte©econn€tiitfon. LONDON: Printedfor£ationers-Hall,16^7.

I I SOME REMARKS UponalatePaper,Entituled, A?tArgument^fheming^that aStandingArmy isIn- confiflentwithafreeGo- vernment^andahfolutely deftruciivetotheConjiitu- tionoftheEngli/hMo- narchy, LatintoHintsnomoredifficile, ThantoaBlack^Bird'tktoWhijile, SoLearnJ—thathecaninDifpute Confute,—ChangeHands,andfiiliConfute.

PrintedintheYeariS^j. Get this from a library. Some reflections on a pamphlet lately publish'd, entituled, An argument shewing that a standing army is inconsistent with a free government.

[Daniel Defoe; John Trenchard; Miscellaneous Pamphlet Collection (Library of Congress)]. The Argument against a standing army rectified: and the reflections and remarks upon it in several pamphlets consider'd, in a letter to a friend by Trenchard, John, Argument shewing that a standing army is inconsistent with a free government.

shewing that a Standing Army is inconsistent with a Free An Argument Shewing that a Standing Army is may also serve as a backdrop against which the more technical topics in this book will. An Argument, shewing that a Standing Army is inconsistent with a Free Government, and absolutely destructive to the Constitution of the English Monarchy.

the second part of an Argument, Shewing, that a Standing Army Is inconsistent with a Free Government, and absolutely destructive to the Constitution of the English Monarchy. [Trenchard, John] An argument, shewing, that a standing army is inconsistent with a free government, and absolutely destructive to the constitution of the English monarchy.

London,"advertisement" leaf at end (i.e. variant 2), [ESTC R] iii. [Somers, John] A letter, ballancing the necessity of keeping a land-force in times of peace.

John Trenchard, An Argument, Shewing that a Standing Army Is Inconsistent with a Free Government and absolutely destructive to the Constitution. Trenchard, J. ( b), The second part of an argument, showing that a standing army is inconsistent with a free government, and absolutely destructive to the constitution of the English monarchy.

A postscript, containing remarks on a late published list of irish papists now in the french King's service, London: s.n. The maintenance of militias and the support of citizen’s rights to arm themselves are both key features of Republican thought.

John Trenchard and Walter Moyle summarised these views in An Argument showing that a Standing Army is inconsistent with a Free Government, and absolutely destructive to the Constitution of the English Monarchy.

Trenchard, John, Argument shewing that a standing army is inconsistent with a free government. England and Wales. Army. Standing army. Notes. Errata: p. A reply to John Trenchard's An argument shewing that a standing army is inconsistent with a free government. Reproduction of original in Huntington Library.

Author of Cato's letters, A short history of standing armies in England, An argument shewing that a standing army is inconsistent with a free government and absolutely destructive to the constitution of the English monarchy, An history of standing armies in England, Cato's letters, or, Essays on liberty, civil and religious, and other important subjects, Essays on important subjects, The.

Entituled, an Argument Shewing That a Standing Army Is Inconsistent With a Free Government, and of the English Monarchy (Classic Reprint) by Daniel Defoe The Coincidence Couch by Mel Gilden The Mechanisms of Governance by Oliver E.

The Second Part Of An Argument Shewing That A Standing Army Is Inconsistent With A Free Government. Find all books from Trenchard, John. At you can find used, antique and new books, compare results and immediately purchase your selection at the best price.

This. With Walter Moyle, Trenchard had previously written An Argument Shewing that a Standing Army is Inconsistent with a Free Government, and Absolutely Destructive to the Constitution of the English Monarchy (London, ).

This was followed the next year by Trenchard’s A Short History of Standing Armies in England (London, ). Argument shewing that a standing army is inconsistent with a free government: Brieven over de vryheid, en het geluk des volks onder een goede regeering: Cartas de catón: (Trenchard & Gordon, ) The case of John Trenchard, and James Smyth, [bracket] Esquires: Cato's letters: Cato's political letters in the London journal: Cato's vision.

This first series of quotes is from John Trenchard's book “An Argument Shewing, that a Standing Army is inconsistent with a Free Government, Do NOT enlist/join military or any government policing agency.

Discourage anyone you know from doing so through reasoned logic - some of which is well collected above. With Walter Moyle he wrote An Argument, Shewing that a Standing Army is Inconsistent with a Free Government () and A Short History of Standing Armies in England ( and ).

He developed anticlerical lines of argument in The Natural History of Superstition (), and The Independent Whig, a weekly periodical published in – This first series of quotes is from John Trenchard’s book “An Argument Shewing, that a Standing Army is inconsistent with a Free Government, and absolutely destructive to the Constitution of the English Monarchy” [link edited for length].

Bibliography Includes index. Contents. Volume; 1: Constitutional Theory Some Reflections on a Pamphlet Lately Publish'd ()-- An Argument Shewing that a Standing Army is not Inconsistent with a Free Government ()-- A Brief Reply to the History of Standing Armies ()-- The Original Power of the Collective Body ()-- Some Remarks on.

— Aristotle, as quoted by John Trenchard and Water Moyle, An Argument Shewing, That a Standing Army Is Inconsistent with a Free Government, and Absolutely Destructive to the Constitution of the English Monarchy [London, ].

His first publication, in conjunction with Walter Moyle [q. v.], was ‘An Argument showing a Standing Army inconsistent with a free Government,’ (thrice reprinted); it was followed by ‘A Short History of Standing Armies in England,’ (reprinted ); much angry controversy ensued.

Why Heller Is Such Bad History By Noah Shusterman on October 7, Categories: History, Second Amendment, Supreme Court. When I began the research for my recent book, Armed Citizens: The Road from Ancient Rome to the Second Amendment, my goal was to understand the origins of American gun laws.I was hardly alone in this, of course; there is an enormous amount of.

In John Trenchard published, a pamphlet entitled An Argument Showing that A Standing Army Is Inconsistent With A Free Government, And Absolutely Destructive To The Constitution Of The English Monarchy.

The question of a standing army being at that.(Aristotle, as quoted by John Trenchard and Water Moyle, An Argument Shewing, That a Standing Army Is Inconsistent with a Free Government, and Absolutely Destructive to the Constitution of the English Monarchy [London, ]) "No kingdom can be secured otherwise than by arming the people.An argument shewing that a standing army is inconsistent with a free government and absolutely destructive to the constitution of the English monarchy.

by: Trenchard, John, Published: () A short history of standing armies in England by: Trenchard, John, Published: ().